黄循财就林志蔚对班级规模及私人学费作用的评论发表演说
黄和林讨论了学校系统中师生比例等问题。

黄和林讨论了学校系统中师生比例等问题。
Implementation challenges include fiscal costs (e.g., GST reduction, caregiver allowances) and political resistance to reforms like GRC abolition.
The Progress Singapore Party (PSP) released its manifesto for Singapore's 2025 General Election, titled “Progress for All,” outlining over 60 policy proposals to address key national issues.
The manifesto focuses on building a fair society, ensuring dignified living standards, providing diverse educational pathways, and strengthening democratic institutions.
Below is a detailed, reorganized summary of the manifesto’s key points, structured for clarity and coherence, based on the provided document.
The PSP addresses Singapore’s escalating cost of living, driven by a 18% rise in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) from July 2020 to February 2025, with specific increases in hawker food (20%), public transport (20%), and water prices (18%). The GST hike from 7% to 9% in 2024 and soaring HDB resale prices (50% increase from Q2 2020 to Q4 2024) exacerbate the burden, while median wages have only risen 21% from $4,534 to $5,500.
Policy Area | Key Proposal | Intended Impact |
---|---|---|
GST | Reduce to 7%, exempt essentials | Ease regressive tax burden |
Land Costs | Defer HDB land costs, spread land sales revenue | Lower housing and business costs |
Hawker Reforms | Fixed/low rents, phase out SEHCs | Keep food prices affordable |
Healthcare | Nationalize insurance, centralize drug procurement | Reduce medical expenses |
The PSP critiques the BTO system’s long waiting times and rising resale prices (50% increase from Q2 2020 to Q4 2024), driven by land costs (60% of BTO costs) and lease decay concerns. The government’s subsidies to keep BTO prices affordable increase fiscal burdens, necessitating a rethink of housing policies.
Policy Area | Key Proposal | Intended Impact |
---|---|---|
AHS | Exclude land cost for owner-occupied flats | Affordable housing, protect retirement savings |
Singles | Lower age to 28 for BTO/resale flats | Meet young Singaporeans’ housing needs |
Supply | Build ahead of demand, repurpose properties | Reduce waiting times |
Rentals | Millennial Apartments Scheme | Flexible housing for youth |
With foreign workers comprising 39% of the workforce, the PSP aims to prioritize Singaporeans while ensuring fair competition and better work-life balance, addressing overwork (90% work beyond official hours) and wage stagnation.
Policy Area | Key Proposal | Intended Impact |
---|---|---|
Wages | $2,250/month minimum wage | Ensure dignified living |
Foreign Workers | EP quotas, levy, higher salary threshold | Prioritize Singaporeans |
Protections | No non-compete for retrenched, statutory benefits | Enhance job security |
Leave | Equal 15-week parental leave | Promote gender equity |
The PSP seeks to simplify and strengthen social support, reducing reliance on complex schemes and supporting caregivers, seniors, and healthcare needs.
Policy Area | Key Proposal | Intended Impact |
---|---|---|
Redundancy | 75% salary for 6 months | Financial security for unemployed |
Caregivers | $1,250/month for child caregivers | Support unpaid contributions |
Seniors | Double Silver Support payouts | Dignified retirement |
Healthcare | Expand MediSave, fund ART | Reduce out-of-pocket costs |
Despite Singapore’s top PISA 2022 rankings, the PSP critiques over-reliance on tuition ($104.80/month household expenditure in 2023) and high-stakes exams, which foster fear of failure (2018 PISA). The system should offer diverse pathways and equal opportunities.
Policy Area | Key Proposal | Intended Impact |
---|---|---|
Curriculum | Optional PSLE, holistic focus | Reduce exam stress, broaden skills |
Schools | Diverse sizes, smaller classes | Meet varied student needs |
Mental Health | Annual assessments, more counsellors | Support student/teacher well-being |
Access | Limit foreign grants, expand vocational paths | Prioritize Singaporeans, diversify entry |
The PSP addresses concerns over the PAP’s parliamentary dominance, lack of checks and balances, and recent policy missteps (e.g., Covid-19 dormitory outbreaks, SimplyGo reversal). It seeks to enhance transparency and accountability.
Policy Area | Key Proposal | Intended Impact |
---|---|---|
Transparency | FOIA, declassify documents, asset declarations | Enhance public access, trust |
Electoral System | Abolish GRCs, reform boundaries | Ensure fairer elections |
Media | Liberalize laws, independent committee | Foster diverse, quality journalism |
Governance | Depoliticize PA, non-partisan Speaker | Strengthen impartial institutions |
Launched ahead of the May 3, 2025, election, the PSP’s manifesto builds on parliamentary proposals since 2020, reflecting resident feedback and critiques of PAP policies.
The party emphasizes its role in holding the government accountable, citing past PAP responses (e.g., Pioneer Generation Package) to opposition gains.
Implementation challenges include fiscal costs (e.g., GST reduction, caregiver allowances) and political resistance to reforms like GRC abolition.
The PSP’s focus on affordability, housing, and governance aligns with public concerns, but success depends on electing at least 33 opposition MPs to block constitutional amendments.
No system guarantees flawless candidates, but knowingly selecting a convict pre-election reflects a clearer lapse in judgment.
Singapore Democratic Party’s (SDP) Chee Soon Juan has made a questionable choice nominating Ariffin Sha, the 27-year-old founder of Wake Up, Singapore (WUSG), to contest Marsiling-Yew Tee GRC.
The decision is not a minor oversight—it points to a lapse in judgment that may cast doubts on Chee’s fitness for ministerial office.
While the People’s Action Party (PAP) has faced its own scandals involving individuals who were later convicted (Eg. Iswaran), these typically emerge after elections, not before.
In August 2024, Ariffin was fined S$8,000 after pleading guilty to criminal defamation for publishing a fabricated story about KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, falsely claiming a woman suffered a miscarriage due to negligence.
Chee’s response to Ariffin's red flag is has been evasive.
At a press conference on April 13, 2025, he urged voters to focus on SDP’s policies, not Ariffin’s past, and compared the case to former PAP Speaker Tan Chuan-Jin’s resignation over an extramarital affair. The comparison misses the mark: Tan’s personal lapse, while serious, did not involve lawbreaking or public harm.
Chee’s deflection sidesteps the core issue of vetting a candidate with a known conviction.
The PAP is not immune to scrutiny.
Cases like former Transport Minister S. Iswaran’s corruption charges in January 2024 and former Tampines GRC MP Cheng Li Hui’s affair with Speaker of Parliament Tan Chuan Jin reveal vetting gaps.
However, these issues emerged after elections. The PAP acted decisively, removing Iswaran from his post and asked both Tan Chuan Jin and Cheng Li Hui to resign.
No system guarantees flawless candidates, but knowingly selecting a convict pre-election reflects a clearer lapse in judgment.
Ariffin’s case strikes at Singapore’s zero-tolerance stance on misinformation.
In 2024, POFMA was invoked 15 times to correct falsehoods, underscoring the harm of unchecked narratives. Ariffin’s defamation directly contravened this ethos, making his nomination a liability in a constituency where community cohesion is vital.
Residents value reliability in governance. Chee’s oversight suggests a disconnect, potentially eroding confidence in SDP’s ability to address bread-and-butter issues like job security and affordability.
Ariffin’s supporters may cite his work with Wake Up, Singapore, which amplifies marginalized voices, or argue his youth mitigates his error. These arguments carry limited weight.
Public office demands high standards, especially in Singapore, where trust underpins stability.
Ariffin’s conviction reflects a lapse in responsibility, and Chee’s endorsement suggests inadequate scrutiny.
China aims to dominate ASEAN by leveraging Singapore’s diplomatic influence and cultural ties, while Israel seeks to preserve its strategic alliance with Singapore - one of very few countries still allied with Israel in ASEAN.
Disclaimer: This analysis is a speculative exploration based on geopolitical trends, historical patterns, and open-source intelligence.
Foreign interference isn’t a conspiracy theory; it’s a global reality, from Russia’s 2016 U.S. election hacks to China’s whispered influence in Australia.
Singapore, a tiny island with outsized influence, is a high-value target. Its role as a global financial hub, with approximately S$5.4 trillion in assets under management makes its electoral outcome a matter of international consequence.
China, Singapore’s largest trading partner with S$150 billion in bilateral trade in 2022, has strong incentives to influence GE2025.
As ASEAN’s diplomatic anchor, Singapore influences regional policies critical to China’s Belt and Road Initiative and South China Sea claims.
A government aligned with Beijing would enhance its dominance in Southeast Asia, where Singapore’s neutrality is a linchpin.
Moreover, Singapore’s military training partnerships with Taiwan make it a target for China’s efforts to suppress Taiwanese independence narratives.
Past disinformation campaigns
China has a well-documented history of disinformation:
Taiwan: Beijing has used deepfakes and propaganda to discredit Taiwanese leaders and deter voters from supporting independence, targeting Chinese-speaking communities to sow division, as reported by regional security experts.
Philippines: China has promoted narratives portraying itself as a constructive regional actor while casting doubt on U.S. reliability, aiming to weaken U.S.-Philippine ties, per the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
Singapore (2017): A notable incident involved Huang Jing, a U.S. citizen and academic at the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, who was expelled in August 2017 for acting as an agent of influence for a foreign country, widely understood to be China. Huang used his position to share privileged information with foreign intelligence operatives and attempted to influence Singapore’s foreign policy, per MHA.
Potential impact in Singapore
Singapore’s 74% ethnic Chinese population and economic ties with China create vulnerabilities to disinformation.
AI-generated deepfakes on platforms like Meta and Tiktok could depict candidates disparaging Chinese culture, alienating voters.
Cyber operations might target journalists of alternative and mainstream media outlets, while covert funding through Chinese business networks or clan associations could support pro-China candidates.
The October 2024 deepfake video targeting former President Halimah Yacob, falsely showing her criticizing the government, underscores this threat.
The 2020 case of Dickson Yeo, a Singaporean sentenced in the U.S. for spying for Chinese intelligence, further highlights Beijing’s use of local operatives, though Yeo claimed no disloyalty to Singapore.
Why Singapore?
Singapore’s diplomatic leadership in ASEAN and military ties with Taiwan make it a strategic target.
China’s ambition to dominate ASEAN relies on influencing key players like Singapore, whose neutral stance could shift regional dynamics if manipulated.
Disinformation could erode public trust or promote candidates aligned with Beijing’s goals.
Israel, a key defense partner supplying Singapore with technologies like the Iron Dome, seeks to maintain a government supportive of bilateral ties.
As one of Singapore’s few ASEAN allies alongside Thailand, and with neighbors like Malaysia and Indonesia holding anti-Israel stances, Singapore’s pro-Israel policies are crucial.
A change in government could disrupt defense cooperation or weaken Israel’s Southeast Asian foothold, where Singapore is a diplomatic and technological hub.
Past disinformation campaigns
Israel’s disinformation efforts, particularly since the Gaza war, have aimed to shape global narratives:
U.S. Lawmakers (2024): Israel funded a $2 million campaign through Stoic, a Tel Aviv-based firm, using 600 fake social media accounts to target 128 U.S. Congresspeople with pro-Israel messaging. Active as of June 2024, it employed AI tools like ChatGPT and fake news sites to attack UNRWA and influence policy (The New York Times, June 2024).
Gaza War propaganda: AI-driven bot farms spread false narratives to dehumanize Palestinians and pressure policymakers, as reported by The Intercept in February 2024 (Gaza: Israel, Netanyahu, propaganda, lies, Palestinians).
Meta censorship: Israel secured the removal of 38.8 million pro-Palestinian posts on Meta platforms by April 2025, aligning with efforts to suppress criticism (Dropsite News).
Specific falsehoods: Misleading claims, such as audio evidence in the Gaza Baptist Hospital massacre, highlight tactical disinformation (Euronews, February 2024).
Potential impact on Singapore
Israel’s cyber capabilities, exemplified by tools like Pegasus and Graphite used in Singapore pose a threat.
While the 2024 Graphite spyware from Paragon Solutions was reportedly halted, Israel’s history with Pegasus—sold to various governments—suggests that comparable tools remain active.
Disinformation campaigns might target Singapore’s Malay-Muslim community (15% of the population) to counter anti-Israel sentiments, using bots on platforms like Meta.
Covert lobbying through defense or tech partnerships could subtly influence policy.
Why Singapore?
Singapore’s status as a rare ASEAN ally makes it a linchpin for Israel’s regional strategy.
A pro-Israel government ensures sustained defense cooperation and counters regional hostility.
Disinformation could protect these ties by shaping elite perceptions or neutralizing anti-Israel narratives.
Singapore has fortified its electoral process against disinformation:
Foreign Interference (Countermeasures) Act 2021 (FICA): Enables authorities to remove false content and scrutinize foreign funding, countering China’s deepfakes and Israel’s bot campaigns Countering Foreign Interference.
Cybersecurity: The Cyber Security Agency (CSA) secures electoral systems, with 2023 advisories promoting robust digital protections Advisory to Presidential Election Candidates.
Public resilience: Media literacy campaigns and high public trust (84% in government, 2023 Edelman Trust Barometer) equip citizens to identify disinformation Commentary: What Singapore can do more against rising threat of foreign interference.
The FICA law was in the news recently when four members of one of Singapore's richest families were designated as "politically significant persons" for their membership to a China political advisory body. MHA had emphasised that the four individuals had not engaged in any “egregious activity”. As such, their designation can be seen as a pre-emptive move to guard against any potential vulnerabilities to foreign interference.
Also last year, FICA was invoked to block 95 social media accounts linked to self-exiled Chinese billionaire Guo Wengui, the first time that the account restrictions directions under FICA were being deployed.
China aims to dominate ASEAN by leveraging Singapore’s diplomatic influence and cultural ties, while Israel seeks to preserve its strategic alliance.
Singapore’s FICA, cybersecurity, and public resilience provide a strong defense, but sustained vigilance is critical.
Enhanced cyber audits, monitoring of foreign networks, and public education will ensure Singapore’s vote remains untainted.
As GE2025 approaches, the nation’s commitment to sovereignty will determine its success in countering these threats.
PAP manifesto focuses on economic growth, education, social support, healthcare, housing, sustainability, arts, and social cohesion, with detailed initiatives in each area.
The People's Action Party (PAP) launched their manifesto last Thursday (Apr 17), titled "Changed World, Fresh Team, New Resolve – Securing a Brighter Future for You."
Manifesto focuses on economic growth, education, social support, healthcare, housing, sustainability, arts, and social cohesion, with detailed initiatives in each area.
Here are the key points:
The PAP, as the ruling party, launched its manifesto on April 17, 2025, titled "Our Manifesto, Our Promise," at Infinite Studios. Prime Minister Lawrence Wong emphasized navigating global changes and defending Singapore's interests. Key proposals include:
Education is framed as a cornerstone for future success, with a focus on inclusivity and lifelong learning:
This pillar aims to build a flexible and inclusive education system, though challenges may arise in scaling these initiatives effectively.
Social support is a critical focus, aiming to uplift vulnerable groups and ensure inclusivity:
These measures aim to create a more inclusive society, though their impact may vary based on funding and community uptake.
Healthcare initiatives are designed to cover the entire lifespan, ensuring comprehensive care:
These initiatives aim to build a robust healthcare system, though challenges may include workforce retention and funding sustainability.
Housing remains a priority, addressing both supply and quality of living:
These efforts aim to ensure affordable and quality housing, though market dynamics may pose implementation challenges.
Sustainability is a key focus, balancing urban development with environmental care:
These initiatives aim to create a sustainable urban environment, though their success may depend on community engagement and funding.
Arts and culture are highlighted as vital for quality of life and national identity:
These efforts aim to enrich cultural and sporting life, though their impact may vary based on public participation.
Social cohesion is framed as essential for national unity and resilience:
These measures aim to build a united and engaged society, though their effectiveness may depend on community buy-in.
Pillar | Key Initiative | Target Beneficiaries |
---|---|---|
Economic Growth | Adopt AI and clean energy | Businesses, PMETs |
Education | Build 4 new SPED schools by 2030 | Students with special needs |
Social Support | Extend Progressive Wages to more sectors | Lower-wage workers |
Healthcare | Add 13,600 new hospital beds in 5 years | General population |
Housing | Build 50,000 new HDB flats in 3 years | Home seekers |
Sustainability | Create 25 new parks | Residents, environmentalists |
Arts and Culture | Expand SG Culture Pass | Arts enthusiasts |
Social Cohesion | Enhance integration efforts | New citizens, diverse groups |
Dr Tan called PM Wong's statement on the US tariffs as a fear-mongering but later admitted that it's a very serious problem.
During the PSP's manifesto launch early this month (Apr 6), Dr Tan Cheng Bock, the party's chairman, criticized the government's response to the US tariffs as "overblown".
He suggested that the government's strong warnings, such as Prime Minister Lawrence Wong's (PM Wong) statement on about the "likelihood of a full-blown global trade war," might be an attempt to "instil fear" in voters to make them choose the incumbent as a "safe bet" ahead of the General Election.
In a YouTube video, PM Wong urged Singaporeans to brace themselves because the risks are real and the stakes high.
Dr Tan called for economists to study the real impact of the tariffs. "Don't just make statements of this kind and scare everybody," he said.
On Saturday (Apr 19), Dr Tan reiterated his party’s stance on the trade war, calling it “a very difficult problem, but a very serious problem” that “we are not taking lightly”.
He said: "Trump is so unpredictable. I cannot give you the answer also. But i don't think that we are just lying low and say oh, nothing to worry. of course, we worry differently. We are looking for answers. This is a very difficult, serious problem. And we are not taking it lightly."
PSP's position on the US tariffs reflects a critical view of the government's initial response as potentially exaggerated for political gain but later recognized the trade war's significant economic implications that should not be taken lightly.
Su | Mo | Tu | We | Th | Fr | Sa |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
30 | 31 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 1 | 2 | 3 |